Recent findings, highlighted by U.S. Right to Know, are questioning the widespread use of neonicotinoid pesticides (neonics) on crops like corn and soybeans. These pesticides are commonly marketed as essential for increasing crop yields. However, evidence suggests they may not be as effective as once believed. For example, agronomist Louis Robert was dismissed after trying to publish findings in Québec that showed no significant improvement in crop yields from using neonics, highlighting serious doubts about their benefits.
In response to concerns about their effectiveness and the harm they cause to bees and other pollinators, states like New York and Vermont have begun limiting neonics use. U.S. Right to Know has been instrumental in publicizing this issue, helping to spark a broader national debate on whether the agricultural benefits of these pesticides justify their environmental risks.
As the debate continues, more states are considering restrictions on neonics, influenced by research and advocacy by groups like U.S. Right to Know. While pesticide manufacturers claim these chemicals are crucial for high crop yields, independent studies suggest the benefits are minimal. This growing discussion is emphasizing the need for more research and better policies that consider both economic and environmental impacts of neonicotinoids.
SOURCE:
U.S. Right to Know, March 10, 2025
Source: Original Article
Publish Date: 2025-03-10 06:00:00